![]() |
Name
Cash Bids
Market Data
News
Ag Commentary
Weather
Resources
|
Prospects of Above-Normal US Temps Boost Nat-Gas Prices![]() July Nymex natural gas (NGN25) on Tuesday closed up by +0.028 (+0.76%). July nat-gas prices on Tuesday added to Monday's sharp rally and settled higher on the prospects of hotter US weather boosting nat-gas demand from electricity providers to power increased air-conditioning usage. Forecaster Atmospheric G2 stated on Tuesday that temperatures are expected to be above normal across most of the central and eastern US for June 8-12. Lower-48 state dry gas production Tuesday was 103.9 bcf/day (+1.7% y/y), according to BNEF. Lower-48 state gas demand Tuesday was 68.8 bcf/day (-2.7% y/y), according to BNEF. LNG net flows to US LNG export terminals Tuesday were 12.9 bcf/day (-12.9% w/w), according to BNEF. A decline in US electricity output is negative for nat-gas demand from utility providers. The Edison Electric Institute reported last Thursday that total US (lower-48) electricity output in the week ended May 24 fell -4.4% y/y to 77,837 GWh (gigawatt hours), although US electricity output in the 52-week period ending May 24 rose +3.25% y/y to 4,249,859 GWh. Last Thursday's weekly EIA report was bearish for nat-gas prices since nat-gas inventories for the week ended May 23 rose +101 bcf, right on expectations, but above the 5-year average build for this time of year of +98 bcf. As of May 23, nat-gas inventories were down -11.7% y/y and +3.9% above their 5-year seasonal average, signaling adequate nat-gas supplies. In Europe, gas storage was 49% full as of June 1, versus the 5-year seasonal average of 60% full for this time of year. Baker Hughes reported last Friday that the number of active US nat-gas drilling rigs in the week ending May 30 rose +1 to 99 rigs, modestly above the 4-year low of 94 rigs posted on September 6, 2024. Active rigs have fallen since posting a 5-1/2 year high of 166 rigs in Sep 2022, up from the pandemic-era record low of 68 rigs posted in July 2020 (data since 1987). On the date of publication, Rich Asplund did not have (either directly or indirectly) positions in any of the securities mentioned in this article. All information and data in this article is solely for informational purposes. For more information please view the Barchart Disclosure Policy here. |
|